Closed BetaFounding Phase
Founding phase — open now · After that: from £4/month · A numbered place  ·  the Founder badge  ·  every future feature  ·  back the build
Home/Case Studies/Rights & Resilience
Rights & Resilience

The common law study group that moved off surveilled platforms

A 60-member group studying constitutional rights, common law, and lawful responses to overreach needed a private, secure space to share legal resources, discuss cases, and coordinate — on a platform that couldn't be pressured to hand over their data.

End-to-end encrypted by architecture 8 documented cases in 3 months Group decisions formally recorded
Common law study group
"Encryption you don't have to take on trust — it's built into the architecture."

Better than Facebook wasn't good enough

A 60-member group studying constitutional rights, common law, and lawful responses to overreach needed a private, secure space to share legal resources, discuss cases, and coordinate lawful responses. They had been on Telegram, which — while better than Facebook — was not end-to-end encrypted by default and had no governance mechanism for the group itself.

Members were increasingly concerned about having sensitive discussions on a platform that could be pressured to hand over data. They also wanted a more structured approach to shared legal resources than pinned messages in a chat.

Encryption, structure, and a real vote

The group migrated to ETC primarily for the encryption guarantee. Messages are encrypted on the sender's device before transmission — ETC technically cannot read them. This is not a policy promise; it is architecture.

The Community Action tools give them structured incident reporting — members can document incidents, attach evidence, and share case files only with specified members. The forum replaced their pinned messages with a searchable, categorised legal resource library — cases, templates, guides, and references organised by topic.

The governance tools mean every member votes on decisions. When the group decided to widen membership to trusted referrals from existing members, that decision was formally proposed, discussed, and voted on — with the record preserved permanently.

Features this community uses
💬 Messaging 👥 Groups 🗣️ Forum ⚖️ Community Action 🗳️ Governance 🔐 Vault
On end-to-end encryption: Messages are encrypted on the sender's device before transmission — ETC technically cannot read them. This is not a policy promise; it is architecture.

What changed — concretely

🔐
End-to-end encrypted — messages architecturally unreadable
Messages are encrypted on the sender's device before transmission. ETC cannot read them — not by policy, by architecture.
📚
Structured legal resource library
The forum replaced chaotic pinned messages with a searchable, categorised library of cases, templates, guides, and references.
📋
8 documented cases in 3 months
The Community Action tools gave the group structured incident reporting — documented, evidenced, and access-controlled.
🗳️
Group governance decisions formally recorded
Membership and rule changes are formally proposed, discussed, and voted on — with the record preserved permanently.
🤝
Vouching prevented fake or compromised accounts
Every member personally vouched for — no anonymous access, no infiltration risk.

What this group runs on

Encrypted messaging, a legal library & a vote

Encrypted messaging and groups, a searchable legal resource forum, community-action incident tools, group governance and a secure vault — all composed on one membership. Full case management unlocks at the Trusted level. Modular pricing starts from £4/month.

Build your plan & see your price →

Ready to build something like this?

The closed beta is live now. Back the build to become a numbered founding member, or join the waitlist. See what membership includes.